Discovery training
A first session to give the whole team the same foundation: what these tools can do, what they cannot, and the first few moves that save time from the next morning on.
Your HR teams leave with a method they can apply to their own files the very next day: writing a job advert in minutes, working through a stack of applications without delegating the decision, producing an employment certificate that matches Swiss practice. All of it with a data protection framework set out in the first hour.

An HR department starting to use generative artificial intelligence almost always runs into the same wall. On one side, writing and reading tasks that take up a disproportionate amount of time: a job advert to reword for the third time, forty applications to work through before Friday, an employment certificate to draft without getting a single formulation wrong. On the other, the most sensitive data in the organisation, the kind you do not paste into a consumer tool without knowing where it ends up. That is exactly what our AI HR training is for: embedding AI into day-to-day HR processes without ever delegating a decision that affects a person.
In practice, both problems already coexist. Some of your staff are probably already using AI on a personal account, with extracts from files they should not be putting there. Others rule out any use out of caution and keep losing hours on tasks a properly framed tool handles in minutes. Banning without offering an alternative does not remove the practice, it drives it underground, which makes it invisible, and therefore dangerous.
Our position fits in one sentence: AI proposes, people decide. It has every place in preparing, structuring and speeding up an HR file. It has no place in the decision itself, nor in handling candidate data that has no business being in a prompt. The useful question is never whether AI is reliable, it is what an undetected error costs on this particular process.
This is the question that comes up most often, even before the one about data. If you use AI to shortlist, how do you justify your choice if you are audited? The European AI regulation classifies recruitment systems as high risk. The answer is methodological, not technical: produce a reasoned trail of the thinking, not an opaque score.
AI changes recruitment, candidate selection and career management. That shift calls for thinking about ethical limits and potential bias, not for an act of faith in the tool. We train people in practical vigilance: diversify the criteria, reword instructions to neutralise discriminatory phrasing, validate every step with a human.
Insecurity in the face of automation is real, and that is precisely where the HR function has a role. AI only has a positive impact if it is a lever for making work more human, not a surveillance tool. That framing has to be set at the moment of the training, not six months later.
HR data is among the most sensitive in the organisation. Pasting a named CV or an interview file into a consumer version of a chatbot is a disclosure of personal data that nobody approved. We train people on professional versions, on anonymisation techniques applied beforehand, and on the simple rule that prevents most incidents.
Between administration, recruitment and supporting teams, an HR department is structurally short of time. Most of that workload is reading and writing, which is exactly what AI can speed up. What remains is knowing which tasks to let it loose on and which ones to keep well away from it.


Four families, built from what we actually teach in the room and from what participants report using thirty days later.
| Area | Use cases worked through in the session |
|---|---|
| Drafting |
|
| Research |
|
| Analysis |
|
| Other uses |
|

Training built on your real files, not on generic examples
Before each session we ask you for three or four genuine pain points: a file that keeps slipping, a document nobody has time to write, a manual step everyone copies from the last person. The exercises are built on those, never on a textbook case.
From the first hour we also set a clear rule about what may go through an AI tool and what must never leave your organisation. Your teams walk away with the habit, not just with the demo.
We are not selling yet another HR tool. We train your teams to use the tools you already have, or are about to choose, with a method that treats data protection and human control as prerequisites rather than options.
The contractual lever settles most of the risk for a modest monthly cost: a professional version with a data processing agreement, no retention and no training on your content. A free version offers none of the three. Then the technical lever: data located in Switzerland or in the European Union where available, single sign-on, fine-grained access rights. The classic HR trap: rolling out a paid copilot without first checking who has access to what in your document spaces, then discovering that payslips can be queried. Finally the human lever: a four-level classification of HR data and a usage charter short enough to fit on one page.
On anything touching a decision about a person (shortlisting, appraisal, mobility, termination), we train for strictly preparatory use. The central exercise is an assistant that produces three distinct perspectives on how well a profile fits: that of a senior executive, that of a technical manager, that of an HR professional. The point is not the time saved, it is elsewhere: you end up with a reasoned trail that lets you justify your decision, which a score alone never allows.
We trained an HR department of twenty people. The training worked very well, perhaps too well: a few months later the director called us back because candidate reports had become denser and denser, packed with information and empty of meaning. Some staff had stopped thinking before generating. We have since added a module on how to work with AI without delegating your thinking to it. The order matters: think first, AI second.
A single session produces enthusiasm, rarely adoption. Half-day sessions spaced 1 to 3 weeks apart, with exercises requested between each session, let teams come back with their real files and their real difficulties. It is the round table at the second session that triggers daily use, not the first one.
This is AI HR training designed for teams subject to the Swiss nFADP: your HR teams save time on drafting and working through files, without ever losing control of what goes into a prompt or of the final decision.
Three ways in, depending on your team's starting level and the time you can free up for them.
A first session to give the whole team the same foundation: what these tools can do, what they cannot, and the first few moves that save time from the next morning on.
The complete path, from the foundation through to the most advanced uses in your field, delivered as half-day sessions spaced 1 to 3 weeks apart. A rhythm designed for busy managers: in between, your teams work through exercises on their real files, and we adjust the next session around whatever got stuck.
One short slot, one tool, one precise task. The format to pick when the foundation is already there and a single use case still needs unlocking.
ChatGPT to draft Swiss work certificates that follow local conventions, as an HR manager
90-minute workshop: CHF 1,000. Half day: CHF 2,000. Full day: CHF 3,000 to 3,500. Day of targeted workshops: CHF 2,500. Rates exclude VAT, apply per group session of up to 12 participants, and include travel costs. The spaced half-day programme is quoted on the half-day rate (CHF 2,000 per session).
organisations supported
professionals trained since January 2023
on Google (51 reviews)
participants maximum per session
30 minutes to scope your need, quote within 48 hours.
More than 150 organisations supported and 4,500 professionals trained since January 2023, including HR departments in pension funds, media, the public sector and industry.
Our critical thinking module is not a rhetorical precaution: it was added after an HR training worked too well and candidate reports became unreadable. We tell that story in the room.
That is what guarantees everyone works on their own files rather than on a textbook case. There is no minimum: training four people costs the same and allows far more tailoring.
The scoping questionnaire sent two weeks beforehand is what lets us build the session around your cases, your documents and your actual level.
A satisfaction survey every time, a commitment stated in pairs by each participant at the end of the session, and an open line for your questions afterwards.
This career path comes in five cantonal versions, each with the use cases and examples of the canton concerned.

Jean-Baptiste Berthoux
Chief AI Officer
An engineer by training, Jean-Baptiste gave his first AI coaching in January 2023. Drawing on his experience, he developed a unique pedagogy, the fruit of his field work and his mastery of the tools.
LinkedIn
Rémi Vancayzeele
CEO
Serial entrepreneur, Rémi has 15 years of experience in managing complex projects. In 13 months, he trained more than 1,300 people and built the pool of trainers and consultants at MAIjin.
LinkedIn

Get in touch with Jean-Baptiste and Rémi, they will be glad to answer your questions